When GK Chesterton sets out to expose the folly of feminism, he bemoans the loss of The Universalist. He suggests that Man (as in males) must be narrowly focused - The Specialist - because of his duty to work and support a family:
"What makes it difficult for the average man to be a universalist is that the average man has to be a specialist; he has not only to learn one trade, but to learn it so well as to uphold him in a more or less ruthless society. ...each has not merely to act, but to excel. Nimrod has not only to be a mighty hunter before the Lord, but also a mighty hunter before the other hunters. The electrical engineer has to be a very electrical engineer, or he is outstripped by engineers yet more electrical."
Woman, on the other hand, who has traditionally been The Univeralist - a Jill-of-all-trades, so to speak - in striving to be The Specialist and make her way in the world of business and commerce, is actually reducing her role rather than expanding it. He brilliantly illustrates his point:
"Cast your eye round the room in which you sit, and select some three or four things that have been with man almost since his beginning. Let me suppose that you see a knife on the table, a stick in the corner, or a fire on the hearth. About each of these you will notice one specialty; that not one of them is special. Each of these ancestral things is a universal thing; made to supply many different needs.
The knife is meant to cut wood, to cut cheese, to cut pencils, to cut throats; for a myriad ingenious or innocent human objects. The stick is meant partly to hold a man up, partly to knock a man down; partly to point with like a finger-post, partly to balance with like a balancing pole, partly to trifle with like a cigarette, partly to kill with like a club of a giant; it is a crutch and a cudgel; an elongated finger and an extra leg. The case is the same, of course, with fire; about which the strangest modern views seem to have arisen. A queer fancy seems to be current that a fire exists to warm people. It exists to warm people, to light their darkness, to raise their spirits, to toast their muffins, to air their rooms, to cook their chestnuts, to tell stories to their children, to make checkered shadows on their walls, to boil their hurried kettles, and to be the red heart of a man's house and that hearth for which, as the great heathens said, a man should die.
Now it is the great mark of our modernity that people are always proposing substitutes for these old things; and these substitutes always answer one purpose where the old thing answered ten."
So it is with woman. She seeks to be a pencil sharpener instead of a knife...to serve a single purpose instead of a dozen. In seeking "equality" with men, we are choosing monomania and cleverness over comprehensive capacity and wisdom. The tragedy of becoming specialists is that a specialist is required to "give 'his best'; and what a small part of a man 'his best' is! If he is the first violin he must fiddle for life; he must not remember that he is a fine fourth bagpipe, a fair fifteenth billiard-cue, a foil, a fountian pen, a hand at whist, a gun, and an image of God."
6 comments:
This is much more interesting than clogged toilets*...from which Chesterton book are you quoting and pondering?
*see April's blog...
I particularly like GKC's way of phrasing things--"The electrical engineer has to be a very electrical engineer, or he is outstripped by engineers yet more electrical."
I would feel very self-conscious if I wrote "very electrical engineer." But when GK Chesterton does it, it makes him the "very writer" of writers.
The entire passage you quoted provides much food for thought.
Debbie - be careful...you never know who's reading your comments!! And, by the way, my toilet clogs daily...just in case you're wondering.
I'm quoting from "What's Wrong With the World."
Jennifer - you're so right! The man had a way and his way was brilliant. He states his ideas in unique ways that make the reader ponder before arriving at understanding rather than just saying it outright as we usually do. (He does plenty of outright statements too, but they are always framed by original "illustrations" that get to the heart of and illuminate the plain statement.)
Thanks for the 'heads up'...and yes, I was wondering, NOT!
I am very intrigued by Chesterton's writing. I have not read more than little quotes and snippets here and there, but I am desiring to read an entire work of his-any suggestions to start off with?
I especially like the last quote. I need to remember that; I think thinking like that might help with contentment. Because I am always striving to be (or really more appear) my "best," but not in a good way, like in a "gotta measure up" way. I think if I can remember what a small part of us that is, in any of us, I can allow for, even delight in the "fine," the "fair," and the image of God in myself and others.
Debbie - I recommend "What's Wrong..." or "Orthodoxy." His fiction is fascinating as well - "The Man Who Was Thursday" or "The Man Who Knew Too Much."
You really can't go wrong with him.
Abby - So true. I've always wanted to be the best at everything I put my hand to instead of appreciating that I am a "fine fourth bagpipe."
Post a Comment